Governance Institutional Form

The Political Party

Organized groups competing for political power through elections or other means with shared ideology and goals

1679 CE – Present London, England

Key Facts

1 / 3

When was The Political Party founded?

Origins

Political factions—groups competing for power—existed throughout history, but the political party as organized institution emerged with representative government and expanded electorates. The English Whigs and Tories crystallized during the Exclusion Crisis (1679-1681) as organized groups taking opposing positions on whether the Catholic Duke of York could succeed to the throne. Though contemporaries condemned “party” as faction destructive of public good, these groupings developed persistent identities, coordinated actions in Parliament, and mobilized support in the broader political nation. The party form emerged from the unintended consequences of representative institutions.

The American founding fathers famously denounced parties even as they created them. Washington’s Farewell Address warned against “the baneful effects of the spirit of party.” Yet within a decade, Hamilton’s Federalists and Jefferson’s Democratic-Republicans had organized national political parties with newspapers, caucuses, and electoral coordination. The logic of electoral competition drove party development: candidates needed organization to mobilize voters; voters needed parties to simplify choices. By the Jacksonian era, mass parties with local organizations, patronage networks, and popular conventions had become central features of American democracy.

The 19th century saw parties spread and transform worldwide. European parties evolved from parliamentary factions to mass organizations with dues-paying members, ideological programs, and permanent bureaucracies. Socialist, liberal, conservative, and nationalist parties mobilized newly enfranchised populations. The 20th century added Leninist “vanguard parties” claiming to lead revolutionary transformation, fascist parties mobilizing nationalist anger, and various one-party states where the party monopolized power. Contemporary party forms range from American candidate-centered organizations to European mass-membership parties to authoritarian ruling parties to new digital-age movements. The party has become a nearly universal mechanism for organizing political participation.

Structure & Function

Political parties perform essential functions in democratic governance: aggregating interests, recruiting leaders, contesting elections, organizing government, and providing accountability. They simplify voter choice by bundling positions into coherent (or at least identifiable) packages. They identify and train political leaders through internal competition. They coordinate legislative action, enabling majorities to govern. They structure political opposition, providing alternative governments-in-waiting. Without parties, democratic politics would be chaotic competition among individual candidates; parties provide organizational infrastructure that makes mass democracy possible.

Party organization varies enormously across types and systems. Mass-membership parties (traditional European socialist and Christian democratic parties) built dense local organizations, collected dues, and socialized members into party cultures. Cadre parties (19th-century liberal parties) remained elite organizations without mass membership. American parties developed as decentralized federations of state and local organizations focused on winning elections rather than ideological commitment. Cartel parties increasingly rely on state funding and media access rather than member mobilization. Digital parties experiment with online organization and participation.

Party systems—the patterns of competition among parties—shape political outcomes as much as individual party characteristics. Two-party systems (US, UK) tend toward centrist competition; multiparty systems enable ideological diversity but may complicate government formation. Party systems may be stable for generations or volatile with new parties regularly emerging. The relationship between social cleavages and party systems—how parties represent class, religion, ethnicity, region, or ideology—varies historically and cross-nationally. Electoral rules (proportional versus plurality) strongly influence party system characteristics, creating incentives for consolidation or fragmentation.

Historical Significance

Political parties transformed governance from elite arrangement to mass politics. Before parties, politics was the province of monarchs, aristocrats, and small electorates. Parties mobilized newly enfranchised populations, connected citizens to government, and made political participation a regular feature of social life. The expansion of suffrage and the development of party organization proceeded together—parties provided the organizational vehicle through which mass democracy became possible. Democratic governance without political parties is essentially unknown; the party form is inseparable from democratic development.

Parties also served as vehicles for ideological movements that transformed societies. Socialist parties carried working-class demands into political systems; nationalist parties mobilized ethnic consciousness; religious parties defended traditional values; fascist parties channeled resentment toward authoritarian ends. Parties translated social conflicts into political programs and governmental policies. The welfare state, civil rights legislation, decolonization—major transformations emerged through party competition and party government. Parties were not merely reflectors of social forces but active shapers of political possibilities.

Contemporary democracy faces party-related challenges. Party membership has declined in many democracies; partisan polarization has intensified in others. New forms of political organization—movements, digital networks, populist leaders—challenge traditional party functions. Yet reports of parties’ death are premature: parties continue to dominate elections, organize legislatures, and provide pathways to power. The form adapts, as it has throughout its history, to changing technologies, social structures, and political demands. Understanding modern politics still requires understanding parties—how they organize, compete, and govern.

Key Developments

  • 1679: Whig and Tory parties emerge during English Exclusion Crisis
  • 1688-1714: Party competition shapes British politics under William III and Anne
  • 1792: First American party system; Federalists versus Democratic-Republicans
  • 1828: Democratic Party organized under Andrew Jackson
  • 1834: British Conservative Party founded; modern organization begins
  • 1848: Communist Manifesto; ideological party doctrine
  • 1863: German Social Democratic Party founded; mass party model
  • 1905: Russian Social Democrats split into Bolsheviks and Mensheviks
  • 1919: Weimar Constitution recognizes parties constitutionally
  • 1920s: Fascist parties seize power in Italy, later Germany
  • 1945-1960: Christian Democratic parties dominate post-war Western Europe
  • 1959: Bad Godesberg Program; SPD abandons Marxism; catch-all party
  • 1989: Eastern European Communist parties collapse or transform
  • 2000s: Anti-establishment parties rise across democracies
  • 2010s: Digital organization enables new party forms